Home
Search
Royal Enfield Himalayan Vs BMW G 310 GS Features Comparison
Royal Enfield Himalayan Vs BMW G 310 GS
Royal Enfield Himalayan vs BMW G 310 GS: Royal Enfield Himalayan is priced at Tk 0 while BMW G 310 GS is the one priced at Tk 0. BMW G 310 GS is the more fuel efficient one with a claimed mileage of 30 kmpl while the claimed figure for Royal Enfield Himalayan is 0 Kmpl. |
 |
|
|---|---|---|
| User Ratings |  0 / 10 |
0 / 10 |
| Name | Royal Enfield Himalayan | BMW G 310 GS |
| Brand | Royal Enfield | BMW |
| Brand Origin | ||
| Made/Assemble in | ||
| Engine Type | Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC, Air-cooled | Single cylinder, 4 stroke, 4 Valve, Water Cooled |
| Displacement(CC) | 411 | 313 |
| MaxPower | 24.3 bhp @ 6,500 rpm | 33.52 bhp @ 9,250 rpm |
| MaxTorque | 32 Nm @ 4,500 rpm | 28 Nm @ 7,500 rpm |
| Mileage (Company) * | 0 kmpl | 30 kmpl |
| Mileage (User)* | +/- 0 kmpl | +/- 0 kmpl |
| Top Speed * | 120 kmph | 143 kmph |
| Gears | 5 Speed | 6 |
| Weight | 199 Kg | 175 Kg |
| Seat Height | 800mm | 835mm |
| Fuel Tank | 15 Liter | 11 Liter |
| Brakes (F/R) | 300 mm disc, 2-Piston,floting caliper, 240 mm disc, single,piston floting caliper | Disc Dual Channel ABS, Disc |
| Tires (F/R) | , | , |
| Suspensions (F/R) | Telescopic, 41 mm forks, 200 mm travel, Monoshock with linkage, 180 mm wheel travel | Upside down fork, Cast aluminium dual swing arm |
| Good Sides | ||
| Bad Sides | ||
| Services | ||
| Showrooms / Dealers: | 1 | 0 |
| Price | Tk 0 | Tk 0 |
| Full Features | Click Here for full specs | Click Here for full specs |
